The comparative report brings together the findings from Athens, Barcelona and Glasgow to explore how the right to housing is being reshaped across a continuum of crises. Drawing on timelines of struggles, interviews with activists and tenants, and mapping of key actors, it traces how financialisation, touristification, austerity, asylum and the cost-of-living crisis have reconfigured everyday housing insecurity in each city. At the same time, it highlights common threads in housing movements’ responses – from feminised labour and mutual aid practices that sustain households, to anti-racist organising against “everyday bordering”, and emerging ecological claims for warm, safe and energy-efficient homes. By reading these three cases side by side, the report points to both shared patterns and crucial differences, offering a grounded, translocal perspective on what it means to claim the right to housing today.